[ofw] RE: IPoIB NDIS 6.0 - what is the proposed svn file structure?

Tzachi Dar tzachid at mellanox.co.il
Tue May 26 13:59:58 PDT 2009


I believe that changing the names of  ipoib.sys & netipoib.inf to
something like  ipoib6.sys & netipoib6.inf should be a good idea.

Otherwise the chance to get confused is very big.

Thanks
Tzachi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Smith, Stan [mailto:stan.smith at intel.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:26 PM
> To: Alex Naslednikov; Tzachi Dar
> Cc: Leonid Keller; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: IPoIB NDIS 6.0 - what is the proposed svn file structure?
> 
> Alex Naslednikov wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I work on NDIS 6.0
> > I started the work directly on IPoIB_CM branch, so I propose to use 
> > only one branch, that will contain all of these above:
> > {UD+CM} over NDIS 6.0
> >
> > XaleX
> 
> Hi Alex,
>   Then I am to understand that once your NDIS 6.0 work is 
> merged into the SVN trunk, we will have the following file structure:
> 
>  trunk\ulp\IPoIB_CM                     # new NDIS 6.0 IPoIB 
> (Datagram & Connected Modes).
>  trunk\ulp\IPoIB                                # existing 
> NDIS 5.1 IPoIB (Datagram Mode)
> 
> The NDIS 5.1 code is required for Server 2003 and XP support.
> 
> Will NDIS 6.0 IPoIB filenames be ipoib.sys & netipoib.inf?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Stan.
> 
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Smith, Stan [mailto:stan.smith at intel.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:37 PM
> > To: Tzachi Dar
> > Cc: Leonid Keller; Alex Naslednikov; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> > Subject: IPoIB NDIS 6.0 - what is the proposed svn file structure?
> >
> > Hello,
> >   I'm not entirely clear as to who is working on NDIS 6.0 
> IPoIB, hence 
> > the broad addressing.
> >
> > What are you thoughts on how the SVN file system structure 
> will look 
> > like once the following work is SVN committed:
> >
> > 1) NDIS 6.0 IPoIB code (Datagram mode)
> > 2) NDIS 6.0 IPoIB CM (Connected Mode)
> > 3) NDIS 5.2 IPoIB, I'm assuming there is no CM for NDIS 5.2?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Stan.
> 
> 



More information about the ofw mailing list