[ofw] RE: [PATCH] umad - add missing item from latest management tree

[Sean Hefty]

>> That doesn't really explain anything.  How is opensm using this
>> value, and what assumptions does it make about its size?  We should
>> make sure that we have the right fix here.
>
>Why are you being so difficult to work with here?

You're asking to change code with zero explanation as to why the code needs to
change.

>OpenSM 3.2.? added the value to umad.h file and referenced it in
>osm_vendor_umad.c.

>If you have issues with the code, then take it up with those who wrote the code
>and stop impeding forward progress of getting a sorely needed newer revision of
>OpenSM to the Windows community.

If you want to change the windows version of libibumad, then submit a patch
against that code with a reason why that change is needed.  The #define that you
gave in the patch is wrong.  The limit is much, much higher on windows.

- Sean