[ofw] [bug] Assert in opensm 3.3.11
Hal Rosenstock
hal.rosenstock at gmail.com
Mon Oct 17 12:01:00 PDT 2011
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Smith, Stan <stan.smith at intel.com> wrote:
> Done.
>
>
>
Is this using 1024 or BUFSIZ ?
-- Hal
>
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks.****
>
> ** **
>
> Revision: 3309****
>
> Author: stan.smith at intel.com****
>
> Date: 11:33:08 AM, Monday, October 17, 2011****
>
> Message:****
>
> [OPENSM] side-step win8 assert; use agreed upon BUFSIZ value.****
>
> ----****
>
> Modified : /gen1/branches/mlx4/ulp/opensm/user/opensm/main.c****
>
> ** **
>
> Revision: 3310****
>
> Author: stan.smith at intel.com****
>
> Date: 11:34:48 AM, Monday, October 17, 2011****
>
> Message:****
>
> [OPENSM] side-step win8 assert; use agreed upon BUFSIZ value.****
>
> ----****
>
> Modified : /gen1/trunk/ulp/opensm/user/opensm/main.c****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:
> ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] *On Behalf Of *Smith, Stan
> *Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2011 9:10 AM
> *To:* Leonid Keller
> *Cc:* ofw_list
> *Subject:* Re: [ofw] [bug] Assert in opensm 3.3.11****
>
> ** **
>
> Hello,****
>
> I too noticed this change, no assert() fire on win7; not surprising.
> Seems the discussion Alex, Hal and others had w.r.t. Windows setvbuf(BUFSIZ)
> did not make it into the mainline.****
>
> I’d prefer BUFSIZ as it’s a well-recognized system wide entity, although
> 1024 would work equally well.****
>
> I’ll update, thanks for pointing out the omission.****
>
> ** **
>
> Stan.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Leonid Keller [mailto:leonid at mellanox.co.il]
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 15, 2011 11:23 AM
> *To:* Smith, Stan
> *Cc:* ofw_list
> *Subject:* [ofw][bug] Assert in opensm 3.3.11****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Stan,****
>
> ** **
>
> I got an assert in Win8 on setvbuf (see below).****
>
> It states that *size* should be at least 2.****
>
> Also MSDN agrees with that:****
>
> *size *
>
> Buffer size in bytes. Allowable range: 2 <= size <= INT_MAX (2147483647)**
> **
>
> Here is the suggested patch.****
>
> ** **
>
> Index: main.c****
>
> ===================================================================****
>
> --- main.c (revision 8962)****
>
> +++ main.c (revision 8963)****
>
> @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@****
>
> };****
>
> ****
>
> /* force stdout to be line-buffered */****
>
> - setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IOLBF, 0);****
>
> + setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IOLBF, 1024);****
>
> ****
>
> /* Make sure that the opensm and complib were compiled
> using****
>
> same modes (debug/free) */****
>
> _______________________________________________
> ofw mailing list
> ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/attachments/20111017/ec02f41a/attachment.html>
More information about the ofw
mailing list