[openib-general] InfiniBand Test Project === IBTP ===

[Amit Krig]

I think that a trunk directory will be more meaningful, as for the naming
convention I also agree that we should match the kernel or userspace tree
structure

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Hefty [mailto:sean.hefty at intel.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 7:35 PM
To: 'Hal Rosenstock'; Amit Krig
Cc: openib-general at openib.org
Subject: RE: [openib-general] InfiniBand Test Project === IBTP ===

>> The proposed new dir can be under Gen2/trunk  =>
>>
>> https://openib.org/svn/gen2/trunk/ibtp/

My preference would be to place it until a test or existing util directory,
rather than trunk directly.

>>               * core
>>               * ulps
>>                       * ipoib
>>                       * sdp
>>                       * srp
>>                       * kdapl
>>               * iser
>
>The indentation of this looks wrong to me. core and ulps at the same 
>level in the tree; everything else below ulps. Should it be ulps or ulp 
>as in the actual kernel tree ?

I agree that matching the kernel or userspace tree structure would be
better.

- Sean
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050809/192c457b/attachment.html>