[openib-general] Re: kDAPL needs less files

[Tom Duffy]

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:53 -0400, James Lentini wrote:
> I agree Tom. I think the easiest way to do this is one subsystem at a 
> time. To avoid us duplicating work, how responding on this thread with 
> the subsystem(s) you would like to merge.

I guess we can do it one subsystem at a time.  Do you want patches?  Is
this the best way to do it?

> On a somewhat related topic, the DAPL linked list implementation 
> should be removed in favor of the Linux implementation. 
> That would allow us to remove the dapl_llist.c file. 

Started looking into this, but got side tracked on timer issues.

-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050524/c8829ce7/attachment.sig>