[libfabric-users] fi_sockets remote CQ data ordering
Jose, Jithin
jithin.jose at intel.com
Tue Feb 23 13:02:09 PST 2016
Hi Ezra,
Does multiple senders imply multiple Eps or multiple threads?
If TX operations are posted to the same EP, then the completions should be in order. It might be a bug if the completions are out-of-order. It would be great if we could get a reproducer for this.
Thanks,
- Jithin
-----Original Message-----
From: <libfabric-users-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org> on behalf of Ezra Kissel <ezkissel at indiana.edu>
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 12:43 PM
To: "libfabric-users at lists.openfabrics.org" <libfabric-users at lists.openfabrics.org>
Subject: [libfabric-users] fi_sockets remote CQ data ordering
>Hi,
>
>I'm running into an issue where I occasionally see out-of-order
>FI_REMOTE_CQ_DATA being popped from a CQ using sockets FI_RMA.
>FI_ORDER_STRICT is shown in fi_getinfo() and I'm under the
>max_order_waw_size, although I'm not sure that latter limit has an
>impact on the completion ordering. I've verified that my senders are
>writing immediate data in the order expected.
>
>Anything I might be missing? I can work on a fi-only reproducer but I
>wanted to make sure I understood the completion ordering conditions first.
>
>thanks,
>- ezra
>_______________________________________________
>Libfabric-users mailing list
>Libfabric-users at lists.openfabrics.org
>http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/libfabric-users
More information about the Libfabric-users
mailing list