[Ofa_boardplus] XWG meeting minutes 11/29

[Hefty, Sean]

I agree the administration part would be useful.  Not sure it remains harmless or wouldn't require administrative privileges on a system, but having soft-RoCE/iWarp would be beneficial for other purposes as well.


> You can use libfabric over TCP sockets, but it doesn't have the feel
> of RDMA hardware.  What I was going for was something that a user
> could do to emulate having the hardware.  This provides a platform for
> exploring all of the aspects related to RDMA, including things like
> configuration of devices, seeing how the OS reacts to the hardware, as
> well as programming *any* of the RDMA APIs.  This is why I was most
> interested in soft-iWARP or soft-RoCE.
> 
> On 11/29/2018 5:20 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > Woody wasn't referring to the verbs provider.  He was talking about
> using sockets over tcp.
> >
> > RDMA != VERBS   !!!!!
> >
> > If OFA still can't get this right, then, yes, there's no way anyone
> outside of the field is ever going to understand it.
> >
> > OFA has already made the investment.  It's harmless, been available
> for years, and is free.
> >
> >
> >> You’re quite right Woody; I hadn’t thought of using libfabric with
> >> the verbs provider running over Ethernet.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Another approach is the ‘cluster on a laptop’ that I described.
> That
> >> one uses KVM and standard enet virtual switches to create a
> ‘cluster
> >> in a box’.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> In either case, Doug’s point was that the OFA is in a position to
> >> make it easier for people to get exposed to RDMA in a harmless and
> >> zero cost way.  I think that’s something in which the OFA should
> invest.
> >> Fastest way I can imagine to accelerate the adoption of high
> >> performance networks.
> >>
> >> -Paul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Woodruff, Robert J [mailto:robert.j.woodruff at intel.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:59 PM
> >> To: Paul Grun <grun at cray.com>; Jim Ryan <jimdryan at gmail.com>
> >> Cc: ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org,
> >> <ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org>
> >> Subject: RE: [Ofa_boardplus] XWG meeting minutes 11/29
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> There’s no easy way to experiment with RDMA and learn about it,
> >> without buying h/w.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This is not exactly true. With OFI, it supports RDMA and we have a
> >> sockets provider that people can use with any off the shelf
> Ethernet
> >> NIC to experiment and learn about RDMA.
> >>
> >> In fact, we have a lot of development internally that uses the OFI
> >> sockets provider for initial development and then later test and
> tune
> >> it on hardware accelerated RDMA NICs.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Woody
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Ofa_boardplus [mailto:ofa_boardplus-
> >> bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Paul Grun
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:24 PM
> >> To: Jim Ryan <jimdryan at gmail.com <mailto:jimdryan at gmail.com> >
> >> Cc: ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org
> >> <mailto:ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org> ,
> >> <ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org
> >> <mailto:ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org> >
> >> Subject: Re: [Ofa_boardplus] XWG meeting minutes 11/29
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> A tiny nit – the second to approve the minutes was Christoph.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Another small-ish nit - People are dismayed at how hard it is to
> test
> >> things RDMA-related especially by newbies, complicated by the need
> to
> >> buy HW.
> >>
> >> I think it’s a little more than just testing.  There’s no easy way
> to
> >> experiment with RDMA and learn about it, without buying h/w.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Not-so-small nit - Gilad explained openRDMA doesn’t compete with
> the
> >> OFA. Rather it provides help for those wanting to use RDMA. They
> are
> >> not doing new development.
> >>
> >> Rather, Gilad asserted that OpenRDMA doesn’t compete with the OFA
> >> because it is not doing new development. This is incorrect because
> >> the OFA’s mission is not limited to development.  Our mission is to
> >> accelerate the development and adoption of (e.g. RDMA).  No good
> >> argument was offered for why OpenRDMA should not be hosted by the
> OFA
> >> under the auspices of the existing OFVWG (which was originally
> >> requested by MLNX and is currently chaired by MLNX).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The OFA was originally formed specifically to foster the
> development,
> >> support, and adoption of RDMA and stands ready to continue doing
> so.
> >> Nothing about that has changed in our mission.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Paul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Ofa_boardplus [mailto:ofa_boardplus-
> >> bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Jim Ryan
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 12:30 PM
> >> To: ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org
> >> <mailto:ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org> ,
> >> <ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org
> >> <mailto:ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org> >
> >> Subject: [Ofa_boardplus] XWG meeting minutes 11/29
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> A very complex meeting, I hope I got it right
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jim
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ofa_boardplus mailing list
> > Ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org
> > https://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofa_boardplus
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Doug Ledford <dledford at redhat.com>
>     GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
>     Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57
> 2FDD